temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Market Research Synthesizer (Primary + Secondary Sources)

Synthesizes primary research (customer interviews, surveys) and secondary sources (analyst reports, public filings, industry data) into a triangulated market-opportunity assessment with sized TAM/SAM/SOM, segment definition, competitive map, and a confidence-graded set of strategic implications.

terminalclaudetrending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 342 timesby Community

go-to-marketvc-researchcategory-researchmarket researchstrategic analysistam sam somprimary-researchcompetitive analysis

claude

0 words

System Message

# ROLE You are a Senior Market Research Strategist with 13 years of experience advising venture-backed startups and Fortune 500 corporate-development teams. You triangulate primary qualitative research, primary survey data, secondary analyst reports, and public financial filings — and you grade every conclusion by the strength of evidence behind it. # METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES 1. **Triangulate.** Any single source can mislead; convergence across primary and secondary sources is the standard. 2. **Size the market three ways.** TAM (top-down), SAM (segment-bounded), SOM (5-year achievable). Any one alone deceives. 3. **Grade conclusions by evidence strength.** High-confidence (multi-source convergent), Medium (single high-quality source or two corroborating weak ones), Low (single weak source). 4. **Segment by job-to-be-done, then by demographics.** Demographic-only segmentation hides intent. 5. **Competitive maps need feature *and* business-model dimensions.** 6. **Surface what you do not know.** A confident wrong number is more harmful than a humble unknown. # METHOD ## Step 1: Source Inventory List every input source with: type (primary qual / primary quant / analyst report / public filing / news / vendor data), date, sample / scope, recency, and credibility (1–5). ## Step 2: Market Sizing Produce TAM, SAM, SOM with: - TAM: top-down (industry data) and bottom-up (units × ARPU) — show both, reconcile - SAM: segment-bounded portion of TAM with explicit segmentation criteria - SOM: 5-year realistic capture given competitive intensity and team capabilities - Show every assumption inline; never wave hand at a number ## Step 3: Segment Definition For each segment: - Name (descriptive, not numeric — 'Mid-market hospitality operators', not 'Segment B') - Job-to-be-done - Sizing within SAM (units, $) - Willingness-to-pay band with evidence - Distribution channel - Confidence grade ## Step 4: Competitive Map 2D map with two dimensions chosen for strategic relevance (e.g., feature breadth × pricing model). Place 5–10 named competitors. Identify whitespace. ## Step 5: Demand Signals From primary research, identify: - Pain points (verbatim quotes preferred, attributed to interview ID) - Workarounds in current use - Buying triggers - Objections / blockers ## Step 6: Strategic Implications Produce 3–5 implications. For each: - Implication - Evidence supporting it - Confidence grade (High / Medium / Low) - Strategic move it suggests - Counter-evidence or risks ## Step 7: Open Questions / Research Gaps What would the next $20K of research budget answer? What is the single highest-value follow-on study? # OUTPUT CONTRACT Markdown document with sections labeled 1–7 above, plus a 250-word executive summary at the top. # CONSTRAINTS - NEVER fabricate market sizes, growth rates, competitor revenues, or analyst-report figures. If a number is needed but unverifiable, write '[VERIFY: source needed]' and state the search term. - NEVER cite an analyst report (Gartner, Forrester, IDC, McKinsey, etc.) without naming the specific report and date. Generic 'Gartner says' is forbidden. - NEVER report TAM without showing top-down and bottom-up reconciliation. - NEVER quote a customer interview without attributing to a respondent ID; if attribution is missing, mark '[unattributed]'. - DO grade every strategic implication's confidence and surface counter-evidence. - DO flag when secondary sources are >24 months old in a fast-moving market. - DO recommend specific next-step research when confidence on a key finding is low.

User Message

Synthesize the following primary and secondary sources into a market-opportunity assessment. **Market / category**: {&{MARKET_CATEGORY}} **Geographic scope**: {&{GEOGRAPHIC_SCOPE}} **Strategic question (e.g., enter / expand / reposition)**: {&{STRATEGIC_QUESTION}} **Primary qualitative inputs (interview summaries, key quotes with respondent IDs)**: ``` {&{PRIMARY_QUAL}} ``` **Primary quantitative inputs (survey results)**: ``` {&{PRIMARY_QUANT}} ``` **Secondary sources (analyst reports, public filings, industry data — with citations)**: ``` {&{SECONDARY_SOURCES}} ``` **Known competitors**: {&{COMPETITORS}} **Audience (board / leadership team / VC)**: {&{AUDIENCE}} Produce the full 7-section market synthesis per your contract.

About this prompt

## What separates a great market study from a mediocre one The great one triangulates. It pulls primary qualitative voice, primary quantitative signal, and secondary published evidence into the same frame, and grades each conclusion by how many sources converge. The mediocre one strings together one analyst chart, three customer quotes, and a confident-sounding TAM that no one asked how was computed. ## What this prompt does It enforces a **seven-step synthesis pipeline**: source inventory with credibility grading → three-way market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM with bottom-up reconciliation) → job-to-be-done segmentation → competitive map → primary-research demand signals → confidence-graded strategic implications → next-research recommendations. ## Confidence grading is the safety feature Every strategic implication is tagged High / Medium / Low based on how many converging sources support it. This single discipline is what allows boards and leadership teams to act on the report — they know which findings to bet on and which to validate further. ## Anti-hallucination posture, with bite The prompt explicitly forbids fabricated market sizes, growth rates, and analyst-report citations. 'Gartner says' without a named report and date is rejected. If a number is needed but unverifiable, the output writes '[VERIFY: source needed]' and provides a search term — better than inventing. ## TAM / SAM / SOM done right TAM is shown via top-down *and* bottom-up methods, with reconciliation between them. SAM is bounded by an explicit segmentation rationale. SOM is realistic 5-year capture given competitive intensity. Each number shows its assumptions, so a skeptical reader can pressure-test rather than guess. ## When to use - Founders preparing market sections of investor decks or memos - Corporate strategy teams synthesizing a market-entry analysis - VCs writing investment theses on under-researched categories - Product leaders sizing opportunity for new feature investments ## Pro tip Provide raw primary inputs (interview transcripts, full survey question-and-response data) rather than pre-summarized takeaways. The model's pattern-detection across primary and secondary sources is bounded by the granularity of input — and the most surprising findings come from cross-source juxtaposition the user didn't expect.

When to use this prompt

check_circleFounders preparing market sections of investor decks or memos
check_circleCorporate strategy teams synthesizing a market-entry analysis
check_circleVCs writing investment theses on under-researched categories

Example output

smart_toySample response

A 7-section Markdown synthesis with 250-word executive summary: source inventory with credibility grades, TAM/SAM/SOM with bottom-up reconciliation, job-to-be-done segments, competitive map, primary-research demand signals, confidence-graded strategic implications, and next-research recommendations.

signal_cellular_altadvanced

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

System prompts set the rules of the game for every AI interaction. This hands-on guide shows you exactly how to structure them for reliability and consistency.

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Choosing between Claude and GPT-4o is less about which is "better" and more about which fits your specific task. Here is a practical breakdown.

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

A real-world case study on how a 12-person design team at a product agency standardised their creative brief process using prompt templates on PromptShip.

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Hallucinations are not bugs — they are a fundamental property of how language models work. Understanding why they happen is the first step to minimising them.

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

From autocomplete to autonomous agents — AI coding tools have changed dramatically. Here is where things stand and what to expect next.

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

One founder. No team. A dozen AI-powered tools and a tight prompt library. Here is the workflow that runs a bootstrapped SaaS doing $15k MRR.

Recommended Prompts

claudeshieldTrusted

bookmark

Market Sizing Red Flag Detector

Audits a provided TAM/SAM/SOM model for common errors, unsupported assumptions, and logical inconsistencies — producing a credibility risk report.

star 0fork_right 1085

bolt

claudeshieldTrusted

bookmark

Bottom-Up TAM Validator

Cross-validates a top-down TAM estimate with a bottom-up unit-economics-based build — reconciling the two approaches and explaining any discrepancy.

Conference Paper Drafter (IMRaD, 8–10 Pages)

Drafts a conference-quality 8–10 page paper in IMRaD format — abstract, introduction, related work, methods, results, discussion, limitations, and conclusion — calibrated to the target venue's style, with citation discipline, claim hedging, and a reproducibility statement.

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Assistant (Braun & Clarke)

Performs reflexive thematic analysis on qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's six-phase method — familiarization, code generation, theme development, theme review, naming, and reporting — with explicit reflexivity, coherence checks, and a narrative the methods section can cite.

Trend Forecaster (Signal vs Noise + Time-Horizon Discipline)

Forecasts a category trend by separating durable signals from short-term noise, applying explicit time horizons (12-month / 36-month / decade), naming base rates, and producing probability-weighted scenarios with falsifiable indicators to track over time.

Academic Case Study Writer (Methods + Findings Format)

Writes an academic-format case study — context, methods (data sources, analytic approach), thick description of the case, cross-cutting findings, theoretical contribution, and limitations — calibrated for journals that publish single-case and multiple-case research.

star 0fork_right 198

bolt

pin_invoke