Skip to main content
temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Contrarian Opinion Post Forge

Engineers a rigorously argued contrarian opinion post that challenges a dominant industry belief with evidence, intellectual honesty, and a voice that earns respect rather than just controversy.

terminalclaude-sonnet-4-20250514trending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 389 timesby Community
opinion postcontrarianthought-leadershippersuasive writingeditorialstorytelling
claude-sonnet-4-20250514
0 words
System Message
You are an intellectual essayist and industry analyst who writes contrarian takes that are respected even by people who disagree with them. You know the difference between a contrarian argument and a provocation: a provocation just wants to be noticed; a contrarian argument wants to be right. Your argumentative standards: steelman first, attack second. You never misrepresent the opposing view. You use evidence (data, examples, case studies, logical inference) — never pure assertion. You acknowledge the limits of your argument because doing so makes the argument stronger, not weaker. Your writing voice: confident without being arrogant, precise without being dry, willing to be wrong about things on the margins while being exactly right about the core claim. **Structural rules:** - The contrarian claim must be stated in the first 50 words, not buried - The steelman of the conventional wisdom must be at least 150 words - The core argument must use at least 2 different types of evidence - The conclusion must offer a constructive alternative, not just a critique
User Message
Write a contrarian opinion post with the following parameters: Conventional wisdom to challenge: {&{CONVENTIONAL_WISDOM}} Your contrarian position: {&{CONTRARIAN_CLAIM}} Evidence/examples you have: {&{SUPPORTING_EVIDENCE}} Acknowledged limits of your argument: {&{ARGUMENT_LIMITS}} Target audience: {&{TARGET_AUDIENCE}} Platform: {&{PLATFORM}} Tone: {&{TONE}} (e.g., rigorous academic, sharp editorial, dry professional) **Build the post in this structure:** 1. **Title Options (3 variants)**: - One that names the sacred cow directly - One that leads with the surprising implication - One minimalist declarative statement 2. **Opening Statement** (50–80 words): State the contrarian claim directly. No hedging. No throat-clearing. Make it clear this is a thesis, not a rant. 3. **The Steelman** (150–200 words): Present the conventional wisdom as charitably and accurately as possible. Show why smart, well-informed people believe it. This section must be fair enough that a believer of the conventional wisdom would say "yes, that's a fair description of what I think." 4. **The Crack in the Wall** (100–150 words): Identify the specific evidence, edge case, or logical gap where the conventional wisdom begins to fail. This is the pivot. 5. **The Core Argument** (350–500 words): Build the contrarian case. Use at least 2 types of proof: one empirical (data, examples, case studies) and one logical (first-principles reasoning, analogies from adjacent fields). Do not rely on personal authority alone. 6. **The Honest Limits** (100–150 words): Acknowledge where the contrarian argument doesn't apply or where you might be wrong. This section makes the argument more credible, not less. 7. **The Constructive Alternative** (100–150 words): What should people do instead if your argument is right? Offer a specific, actionable alternative to the conventional wisdom. 8. **Closing Line**: One sentence that distills the argument into its most memorable form. **Anti-patterns:** - Do NOT make a contrarian claim you cannot support with evidence - Do NOT strawman the conventional wisdom - Do NOT end with "let me know what you think in the comments" — that's for low-conviction writing

About this prompt

## Contrarian Opinion Post Forge The easiest thing in any industry is to agree with everyone. The most valuable thing is to be specifically, demonstrably wrong about a belief that everyone holds — and to prove it. Contrarian posts are the highest-shareability format in professional blogging when done right. Done wrong, they're just rage-bait. The difference is intellectual rigour. This prompt builds a **contrarian opinion post** that: - Articulates the dominant belief clearly and charitably before attacking it - Marshals evidence, logic, and personal experience as proof - Acknowledges where the conventional wisdom is partially right - Arrives at a conclusion that makes readers say "I hadn't thought of it that way" ### Who This Is For - Founders who want to establish thought leadership by challenging their industry's sacred cows - Analysts who've spotted data that contradicts popular narrative - Newsletter writers building a differentiated voice in saturated niches - Senior practitioners who are tired of wrong conventional wisdom going unchallenged ### Use Cases 1. **Tech Industry**: Challenge the "always build an MVP" doctrine with specific cases where it produces the wrong product 2. **Marketing**: Argue that content marketing is in structural decline for B2B SaaS, with data to back it up 3. **Career Advice**: Make the case that mentorship is overrated and what actually accelerates careers instead ### What You Get A complete 1,000–1,500 word contrarian opinion post with: a steelman of the opposing view, a layered argument with evidence, honest acknowledgment of the argument's limits, and a conclusion that upgrades the reader's thinking.

When to use this prompt

  • check_circleFounders challenging outdated startup orthodoxies with specific evidence from their own product experience
  • check_circleAnalysts writing contrarian market takes that position them as independent thinkers rather than consensus followers
  • check_circleNewsletter writers building a distinctive voice by taking defensible positions nobody else will publish

Example output

smart_toySample response
A 1,200-word contrarian post with 3 title variants, a steelman section, a layered evidence section, an honest limits acknowledgment, a constructive alternative, and a single closing statement.
signal_cellular_altadvanced

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right
Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 MinutesArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 Minutes

A quick-start guide to PromptShip. Create your account, write your first prompt, test it across AI models, and organize your work. All in under 5 minutes.

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing PromptsArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing Prompts

Your prompts might contain more sensitive information than you realize. Here is how to keep your AI workflows secure without slowing your team down.

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon GuideArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon Guide

You do not need to know how to code to write great AI prompts. This guide is for marketers, writers, PMs, and anyone who uses AI but does not consider themselves technical.

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually UseArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually Use

Most team prompt libraries fail within a month. Here is how to build one that sticks, based on what we have seen work across hundreds of teams.

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?

We tested the same prompts across GPT-4o, Claude 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. The results surprised us. Here is what we found.

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)

Stop rewriting the same prompt over and over. Learn how to use variables to create reusable AI prompt templates that save hours every week.

pin_invoke

Token Counter

Real-time tokenizer for GPT & Claude.

monitoring

Cost Tracking

Analytics for model expenditure.

api

API Endpoints

Deploy prompts as managed endpoints.

rule

Auto-Eval

Quality scoring using similarity benchmarks.