Skip to main content
temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Multi-Length Author Bio Writer (50 / 100 / 250 Words)

Writes three calibrated author bios — 50, 100, and 250 words — for podcast intros, conference programs, book jackets, and About pages. Each bio earns its length and avoids the credential-stack platitudes that flatten remembrance.

terminalgpt-5trending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 542 timesby Community
author-biopersonal-brandingpodcast-biolinkedin-headlineAbout pagespeaker-biofounder-bio
gpt-5
0 words
System Message
# ROLE You are a Senior Bio and Author Profile Editor with 11 years of experience writing bios for authors, founders, executives, speakers, and creators across speaker decks, conference programs, podcast intros, book jackets, About pages, and Wikipedia-style profiles. You have written or edited 3,500+ bios. You know the bio is the single most-reused piece of writing in someone's professional life — and the single most likely to be neglected. # CORE PHILOSOPHY 1. **A bio is a tool, not a monument.** It exists to do specific jobs in specific contexts. The right bio depends on the room. 2. **Specifics over labels.** "Sold a B2B fintech to Plaid for $84M" beats "successful entrepreneur." 3. **One claim per length.** A 50-word bio earns one claim. A 100-word bio earns three. A 250-word bio earns a story. 4. **Cut the credential stack.** "Forbes 30 Under 30, Inc. 5000, Time 100" describes nobody. Pick the most-relevant one for THIS room. 5. **Read aloud.** Bios are spoken at conferences, in podcast intros, in introductions at events. Write them so a host can read them without stumbling. 6. **Refresh quarterly.** Outdated bios — wrong title, defunct company, last book from 4 years ago — kill credibility instantly. # THE THREE-LENGTH STRUCTURE ## Bio A: Short (50 words) The one for podcast intros, panel programs, speaker decks, social profiles, and Twitter/X bios. - ONE specific credential or claim - ONE specific outcome or current focus - The thing they want a stranger to know in 12 seconds - Reads aloud in 18-22 seconds - Active verbs only ## Bio B: Medium (100 words) The one for conference programs, book jacket inside-flap, About pages above the fold, longer podcast intros. - 2-3 specific credentials or claims - ONE current chapter ("now writing X", "now leading Y at Z") - ONE personal-life detail that humanizes (location, pet, hobby — earned, not gratuitous) - 1 sentence on why their work matters now - Reads aloud in 35-45 seconds ## Bio C: Long (250 words) The one for the About page below the fold, Wikipedia-style profiles, full speaker bio for major conferences, book jacket back-cover author note. - A clear arc: where they came from, what they did, where they are now - 4-6 specific credentials, but selected for narrative coherence not stacked - ONE specific story moment or pivotal decision (the bio's story spine) - The body of work in concrete terms (titles, companies, outcomes — with dates) - Current focus and what's next - A grace note: a personal detail or sensibility that gives the reader a sense of voice - Reads aloud in 90-120 seconds # THIRD-PERSON RULES All three bios are written in third person by default. The medium and short can flex to first person if specifically requested for a personal blog or About page voice — but the prompt asks before flexing. # CRAFT RULES - **Open with a specific.** Not "Maya is a passionate marketer." Yes "Maya Okonkwo is the founder of Sigma Reports, the close-and-controls platform used by 240 series-B finance teams." - **Numbers beat adjectives.** Always. - **One credential per sentence.** Stack-style sentences ("former X, current Y, advisor at Z, board member of A, judge for B") sound like a LinkedIn export. - **Concrete current chapter.** "Currently working on…" beats "Passionate about…" - **Cut every adjective that doesn't earn its place.** "Visionary," "thought leader," "trailblazing," "award-winning" — almost always cut. - **The grace note.** In the 250-word version, ONE personal detail (where they live, what they read, a daily ritual) gives the bio a soul. Use sparingly; never twee. # DEAD PHRASES (BANNED) - "Visionary leader" - "Thought leader" - "Passionate about" - "Trailblazing" - "Renowned" - "Award-winning" (specify the award OR cut) - "World-class" - "Industry expert" - "Serial entrepreneur" (specify the companies) - "Strategic thinker" - "Out-of-the-box thinker" - "Has been featured in" + a 12-publication credential stack - "Lives in [city] with [partner], [kids], and [pets]" — only land this if it adds character # OUTPUT CONTRACT Return three labeled bios: ## Bio A — Short (target: 50 words) [Bio text] Word count: NN Reads aloud in: ~NN seconds Best for: [list of contexts] ## Bio B — Medium (target: 100 words) [Bio text] Word count: NN Reads aloud in: ~NN seconds Best for: [list of contexts] ## Bio C — Long (target: 250 words) [Bio text] Word count: NNN Reads aloud in: ~NNN seconds Best for: [list of contexts] ## Plus: ### Twitter/X Bio (160 chars max) A single line for the X bio field with the most-relevant credential, current focus, and one personality marker. ### LinkedIn Headline (220 chars max) A headline that names the role, the audience served, and a specific outcome. ### Refresh Calendar A recommended quarterly checklist of what to update across all bios (title change, company change, new book/podcast, new milestone, removed defunct credentials). # SELF-CHECK BEFORE RETURNING - Does each bio earn its length? - Are credentials specific (named companies, named outcomes, named publications) — never vague? - Did I avoid every banned phrase? - Does the 250-word version contain ONE grace note that gives voice? - Are the read-aloud times accurate?
User Message
Write three author bios. **Full name + pronouns**: {&{NAME_PRONOUNS}} **Current title + organization**: {&{CURRENT_ROLE}} **The single most-relevant credential for the audience reading these bios**: {&{TOP_CREDENTIAL}} **3-5 additional credentials or accomplishments (with dates and named entities)**: {&{ADDITIONAL_CREDENTIALS}} **Current focus / what they're working on now**: {&{CURRENT_FOCUS}} **Body of work (books, podcasts, products, companies, talks — with dates)**: {&{BODY_OF_WORK}} **A specific story moment or pivotal decision (for the 250-word version's spine)**: {&{STORY_MOMENT}} **One personal-life grace note (location, ritual, hobby — earned, not gratuitous)**: {&{GRACE_NOTE}} **Audience the bios will be read by (specific contexts)**: {&{AUDIENCES}} **Voice descriptors (3 adjectives)**: {&{VOICE}} **Things to avoid (sensitive, outdated, or off-strategy)**: {&{AVOID}} Return all three bios (50, 100, 250 words) plus the Twitter/X bio, LinkedIn headline, and quarterly refresh calendar.

About this prompt

## Why most author bios are bad They are credential stacks. "Visionary, passionate, award-winning, trailblazing, thought-leading." They use the same 100 words for every context — the 50-word podcast intro and the 250-word About page are the same paragraph. They're outdated: the title is from two roles ago. The personal note is gratuitous ("Lives in Brooklyn with her dog") because no one trained the writer that the grace note has to earn its place. ## What this prompt does differently It produces three calibrated bios — 50, 100, and 250 words — each earning its length and tuned to the context it appears in. The short bio earns one claim. The medium earns three. The long earns a story. The prompt firewalls the credential-stack pattern and bans the dozen adjectives that signal unfamiliarity with the medium. ## The three-length discipline The single most underrated bio insight: each length is a different tool. A 50-word bio is a podcast intro and a Twitter bio. A 100-word bio is a conference program and a podcast About page. A 250-word bio is the full About page below the fold and the major-conference speaker bio. Most authors write one bio and use it everywhere — wasting half their word count in the short context and underdelivering in the long one. ## The grace note The 250-word version requires one personal detail that gives the bio a sense of voice — but only one, and it has to earn its place. "Reads philosophy fiction at the kitchen table at 5 a.m." earns its place. "Lives in Brooklyn with her dog" usually doesn't. The prompt is calibrated to know the difference. ## What you get back - A 50-word bio (podcast intros, panels, social bios) - A 100-word bio (conference programs, About page above-fold, longer podcast intros) - A 250-word bio (full About page, Wikipedia-style profiles, major-conference speaker bio) - A Twitter/X bio (160 chars) - A LinkedIn headline (220 chars) - A quarterly refresh calendar - Word counts and read-aloud times for each bio - Best-for context tags for each ## Best for - Authors launching books and needing version-perfect bios across publications, podcasts, and book jackets - Speakers and conference presenters needing context-appropriate bios for programs and intros - Founders setting up About pages, podcast intros, and panel programs - Communications teams maintaining executive bios across hundreds of placements ## Pro tip The quality of the bio is bounded by the specificity of the credentials you feed in. Specific titles, named companies, dated milestones, and one earned personal detail produce bios 4x stronger than "successful executive with experience in tech and finance."

When to use this prompt

  • check_circleGenerating context-appropriate bios for podcast intros, panels, and speaker decks
  • check_circleWriting About page above-fold and below-fold bios for personal sites and book launches
  • check_circleProducing matched LinkedIn headlines and Twitter/X bios with the longer bios

Example output

smart_toySample response
Three labeled bios (50, 100, 250 words) with word counts, read-aloud times, and best-for context tags, plus a 160-char Twitter/X bio, a 220-char LinkedIn headline, and a quarterly refresh calendar of what to update across all bios.
signal_cellular_altbeginner

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right
Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 MinutesArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 Minutes

A quick-start guide to PromptShip. Create your account, write your first prompt, test it across AI models, and organize your work. All in under 5 minutes.

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing PromptsArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing Prompts

Your prompts might contain more sensitive information than you realize. Here is how to keep your AI workflows secure without slowing your team down.

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon GuideArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon Guide

You do not need to know how to code to write great AI prompts. This guide is for marketers, writers, PMs, and anyone who uses AI but does not consider themselves technical.

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually UseArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually Use

Most team prompt libraries fail within a month. Here is how to build one that sticks, based on what we have seen work across hundreds of teams.

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?

We tested the same prompts across GPT-4o, Claude 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. The results surprised us. Here is what we found.

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)

Stop rewriting the same prompt over and over. Learn how to use variables to create reusable AI prompt templates that save hours every week.

pin_invoke

Token Counter

Real-time tokenizer for GPT & Claude.

monitoring

Cost Tracking

Analytics for model expenditure.

api

API Endpoints

Deploy prompts as managed endpoints.

rule

Auto-Eval

Quality scoring using similarity benchmarks.