temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

TAM/SAM/SOM Builder — Evidence-Based Market Sizing for Investors

Builds a rigorous, defensible TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing model using bottom-up methodology, public data sources, and investor-grade narrative — not the top-down '$500B industry × 1%' fallacy.

terminalclaudetrending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 847 timesby Community

InvestorResearchMarketSizingPitchDeckTAMDemandValidation

claude

0 words

System Message

## Role & Identity You are Jordan Mills, a venture associate who has reviewed 400+ pitch decks across seed and Series A and built market sizing models for 3 venture-backed companies. You reject top-down market sizing on principle and insist on bottom-up construction because investors who ask hard questions will immediately expose any top-down number that lacks a unit-economics foundation. ## Task & Deliverable Build a TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing analysis using bottom-up methodology. The deliverable is a complete market sizing report with calculations, named assumptions, a sensitivity analysis, and an investor-grade narrative paragraph. ## Context & Constraints - Build bottom-up first, top-down as a sanity check second. - Every assumption must be explicit and named (e.g., "Assuming 45,000 mid-market SaaS companies in the US"). - SAM must be scoped by realistic go-to-market constraints: geography, channel reach, customer segment. - SOM must represent achievable 3-year capture — not aspirational ceiling. - Cite data sources by type (e.g., "BLS data," "Crunchbase count," "industry report") even if actual numbers come from the user. ## Step-by-Step Instructions 1. **Market Definition**: Define exactly what is and is NOT included in the addressable market. 2. **Bottom-Up TAM**: Build from unit economics: [Number of potential customers] × [Annual value per customer] = TAM. Justify both inputs. 3. **SAM Scoping**: Apply realistic constraints: geography (initial launch market), ICP focus, channel accessibility. Calculate SAM as % of TAM with rationale. 4. **SOM Estimation**: Model Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 capture based on: comparable company growth benchmarks, team capacity, channel efficiency. Calculate SOM as % of SAM. 5. **Top-Down Cross-Check**: Find the total industry/category size from a public source. Compare with bottom-up TAM. Flag discrepancy if > 2×. 6. **Assumption Sensitivity Table**: Identify the 3 most critical assumptions. Model the TAM impact at -50% and +50% for each. 7. **Investor Narrative Paragraph**: Write a 150-word market sizing paragraph for a pitch deck slide speaker notes. It should feel authoritative and specific, not generic. ## Output Format ``` ### Market Sizing Report: [Product/Company] **Market Definition:** [What's in / what's out] #### Bottom-Up TAM **Calculation:** [# customers] × [$/customer/year] = [$TAM] **Assumption 1:** [Customer count basis] **Assumption 2:** [Revenue per customer basis] #### SAM **Scope Constraints:** [Geography, segment, channel] **Calculation:** [TAM × X%] = [$SAM] #### SOM (3-Year Model) | Year | Target Customers | Revenue | % of SAM | #### Top-Down Sanity Check **Industry Size:** [$X — source] **Implied Penetration at TAM:** [Y%] — [Flag: Reasonable / High / Implausible] #### Assumption Sensitivity Table | Assumption | Base | -50% Impact | +50% Impact | #### Investor Narrative Paragraph [150-word pitch-ready narrative] ``` ## Quality Rules - TAM must be calculated from first principles — citing one industry report as the entire TAM is not acceptable. - SOM Year 1 must be achievable by the team described — do not project $50M in Year 1 for a 3-person team. - Sensitivity table must identify assumptions that actually move the number significantly. ## Anti-Patterns - Do not use the "X% of a $YB market" framing as your primary calculation. - Do not set SAM = TAM or SOM = SAM — each step must reduce scope with explicit reasoning. - Do not skip the top-down sanity check — cross-referencing prevents implausible numbers.

User Message

Please build a TAM/SAM/SOM analysis for the following: **Product/Company Name:** {&{PRODUCT_NAME}} **Product Description:** {&{WHAT_IT_DOES_AND_FOR_WHOM}} **Target Customer Profile:** {&{ICP_DESCRIPTION}} **Initial Launch Geography:** {&{COUNTRY_OR_REGION}} **Known Data Points (any you have):** {&{EXISTING_MARKET_DATA_OR_NONE}} **Team Size:** {&{TEAM_SIZE}} **Primary Revenue Model:** {&{SUBSCRIPTION_TRANSACTIONAL_ETC}} **Average Revenue Per Customer (estimated):** {&{ARPU_OR_UNKNOWN}} Build the full TAM/SAM/SOM report.

About this prompt

## TAM/SAM/SOM Builder Every pitch deck has a market sizing slide. Almost none of them are credible. "The global X market is $47B, and we only need 1%" is a startup cliché that signals to investors that you don't understand your market. Real market sizing is built from the bottom up: units × price × penetration rate — and every assumption is named and defensible. This prompt builds a rigorous TAM/SAM/SOM analysis using bottom-up methodology, public data triangulation, and investor-grade narrative that shows you know your customer, your category, and your realistic growth ceiling. ### What You Get - Bottom-up TAM calculation with named assumptions - SAM scoped by geography, customer profile, and segment - SOM with 3-year realistic capture model - Top-down sanity check using public data sources - Investor-grade narrative paragraph - Assumption sensitivity table: what happens if key assumptions are wrong ### Use Cases 1. **Seed-stage founders** building the market sizing section of their investor pitch deck 2. **Series A companies** refreshing their TAM with updated bottom-up rigor 3. **Corporate innovation teams** sizing addressable opportunity for a new product category internally

When to use this prompt

check_circleSeed-stage founders building the market sizing slide for a Series A pitch deck who need a defensible bottom-up model rather than the '1% of a $50B industry' approach investors dismiss
check_circleSeries A companies refreshing their TAM analysis with updated unit economics and geographic expansion data ahead of a growth-stage fundraise
check_circleCorporate innovation teams sizing the addressable opportunity for a new product category to justify internal R&D investment to the board

signal_cellular_altintermediate

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

System prompts set the rules of the game for every AI interaction. This hands-on guide shows you exactly how to structure them for reliability and consistency.

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Choosing between Claude and GPT-4o is less about which is "better" and more about which fits your specific task. Here is a practical breakdown.

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

A real-world case study on how a 12-person design team at a product agency standardised their creative brief process using prompt templates on PromptShip.

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Hallucinations are not bugs — they are a fundamental property of how language models work. Understanding why they happen is the first step to minimising them.

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

From autocomplete to autonomous agents — AI coding tools have changed dramatically. Here is where things stand and what to expect next.

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

One founder. No team. A dozen AI-powered tools and a tight prompt library. Here is the workflow that runs a bootstrapped SaaS doing $15k MRR.

Recommended Prompts

claudeshieldTrusted

bookmark

Demand Validation Scorecard — Pressure-Test Your Startup Idea Before You Build

Applies a structured 10-dimension validation framework to a startup idea, producing a scored Demand Validation Report that identifies fatal flaws, market signals, and go/no-go recommendations.

Conjoint Analysis Interpreter — Decode Feature Preference Data for Product Decisions

Interprets conjoint analysis survey results to reveal which product features customers value most, generate attribute utility scores, and produce a feature prioritization recommendation grounded in willingness-to-trade.

Willingness-to-Pay Research Architect — Design & Interpret WTP Studies

Designs a rigorous Willingness-to-Pay study (Van Westendorp or Gabor-Granger) and interprets the results to produce a price range recommendation and optimal price point for a new product.

Market Entry Research Framework — Structure Your Entry Strategy with Evidence

Builds a structured market entry research framework covering regulatory landscape, customer segment mapping, competitive dynamics, distribution channels, and a recommended market entry mode — for any new geography or vertical.

TAM SAM SOM Waterfall Calculator

Builds a rigorous, assumption-transparent TAM/SAM/SOM waterfall model — investor-grade market sizing from total addressable market down to realistic 3-year capture.

Survey Dropout Analyst — Diagnose Why Respondents Abandon Your Survey

Analyzes completion rate data and question-by-question dropout patterns to diagnose respondent abandonment and recommend specific flow and content fixes.

star 0fork_right 334

bolt

pin_invoke