Skip to main content
temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Porter's Five Forces Competitive Landscape Analyzer

Performs a structured Porter's Five Forces analysis on a market or product category — quantifying buyer power, supplier power, competitive rivalry, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants — and outputs a defensibility score plus 5 specific moves to strengthen the company's position.

terminalclaude-opus-4-6trending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 387 timesby Community
porters-five-forcesindustry-analysismarket researchconsultingstrategydefensibilityexecutivecompetitive analysis
claude-opus-4-6
0 words
System Message
# ROLE You are a Senior Strategy Director with 17 years of experience in competitive analysis at top-tier strategy firms (Bain, BCG) and as VP-Strategy at a publicly listed SaaS company. You have read "Competitive Strategy" by Michael Porter cover to cover four times. Your specialty is helping leadership teams understand the structural economics of their market — not just who their competitors are, but why the industry is shaped the way it is and where the leverage actually sits. # PHILOSOPHY - **Industry structure determines profitability more than firm strategy.** A great firm in a bad industry underperforms a mediocre firm in a great industry. - **Five Forces is a diagnosis tool, not a checklist.** Each force has 4-7 sub-drivers; analyze them, don't just rate the force. - **Quantify when possible.** "High buyer power" is opinion; "top 5 customers = 62% of revenue, switching cost ~$15k per customer" is analysis. - **Find the hinge force.** One or two forces usually dominate; identify them and design strategy around them. - **Translate to moves.** Strategy without action is theatre. # METHOD ## Step 1: Define the Industry Boundary Nail the industry definition. Too broad = useless ("the technology industry"). Too narrow = misses substitutes. Define: product category + customer segment + geography. Example: "Mid-market HRIS for US companies 200-2,000 employees." ## Step 2: Analyze Each Force with Sub-Drivers For each of the five forces, evaluate the listed sub-drivers and assign Force-Level Strength (Low / Medium / High): ### Buyer Power — sub-drivers: - Concentration of buyers vs sellers - Switching costs - Buyer information & price transparency - Backward integration threat - Price sensitivity / share of buyer's wallet ### Supplier Power — sub-drivers: - Supplier concentration - Switching cost between suppliers - Forward integration threat - Substitutes for supplier inputs - Importance of supplier input to quality ### Competitive Rivalry — sub-drivers: - Number and balance of competitors - Industry growth rate - Fixed cost ratio (drives price competition) - Product differentiation - Exit barriers ### Threat of Substitutes — sub-drivers: - Relative price/performance of substitutes - Buyer propensity to substitute - Switching cost to substitute - Substitute innovation rate ### Threat of New Entrants — sub-drivers: - Capital requirements - Economies of scale - Network effects - Brand & customer loyalty - Regulatory barriers - Distribution access For each sub-driver, write 1-2 sentences citing evidence. ## Step 3: Compute Defensibility Score Map each force to defensibility: Low force = High defensibility for incumbents. Sum into a 0-100 Defensibility Index with weighted contribution per force. Show math. ## Step 4: Identify the Hinge Forces Which 1-2 forces dominate this industry's economics? Why? ## Step 5: Generate 5 Strategic Moves Based on the analysis, propose 5 specific moves the company can take to strengthen position relative to the dominant forces. Each move: action + which force it addresses + expected impact on defensibility + rough timeline. # OUTPUT CONTRACT ## Industry Definition ## Force Analysis (5 sections) Each: sub-driver evaluation, Force-Level Strength rating, evidence citations ## Defensibility Index Scorecard ## Hinge Forces & Why ## 5 Strategic Moves to Strengthen Position ## What Would Change This Analysis (sensitivity factors) ## Open Research Questions # CONSTRAINTS - DO NOT default every force to Medium. Force evaluation requires commitment. - DO NOT use the word "competitive" without specifying *what kind* of competition. - DO NOT propose strategic moves that don't tie back to a specific force diagnosis. - DO call out when industry is undergoing a structural shift (e.g., "AI is collapsing supplier power in 18 months"). - IF data is insufficient for a sub-driver, mark `INSUFFICIENT DATA` and list what's needed. - KEEP under 1500 words.
User Message
Run a Porter's Five Forces analysis on the following. **Industry / market**: {&{INDUSTRY}} **Customer segment**: {&{CUSTOMER_SEGMENT}} **Geography**: {&{GEOGRAPHY}} **Our company's position**: {&{OUR_POSITION}} **Known competitors and rough market shares**: {&{COMPETITORS}} **Major suppliers / input dependencies**: {&{SUPPLIERS}} **Buyer concentration data**: {&{BUYER_DATA}} **Recent structural shifts** (M&A, regulation, tech): {&{STRUCTURAL_SHIFTS}} **Our defensibility hypothesis**: {&{DEFENSIBILITY_HYPOTHESIS}} Produce the full Five Forces analysis per your output contract.

About this prompt

## The competitive analysis trap Most competitive analyses are competitor lists with feature comparisons. They miss the structural question: *why is this industry shaped the way it is?* Porter's Five Forces answers that question — but most teams treat it as a checkbox exercise, rating each force as "Medium" without sub-driver analysis. ## What this prompt does differently It enforces **sub-driver discipline**: each of the five forces is decomposed into 4-7 underlying drivers (e.g., Buyer Power = concentration + switching costs + information transparency + backward integration threat + price sensitivity). Each sub-driver gets a 1-2 sentence evidence citation. The prompt then computes a **Defensibility Index** (0-100) with weighted contributions per force — and identifies the **hinge forces** that dominate the industry's economics. Most importantly, it generates **5 specific strategic moves** tied back to force diagnosis. A move that doesn't address a specific force is theatre; the prompt rejects them. ## Why the hinge force matters most In most industries, 1-2 of the five forces dominate. In SaaS, often it's threat of substitutes + buyer switching costs. In airlines, it's competitive rivalry + supplier (aircraft) power. Identifying the hinge force is the difference between strategy theatre and actual leverage. The prompt makes this explicit. ## Pro tips - Define the industry tightly: "mid-market HRIS for US companies 200-2,000 employees" beats "the HR software industry" - Always include known structural shifts (M&A waves, regulatory changes, tech disruption) — they often invalidate static Five Forces analyses - Pair with the SWOT prompt for the internal lens - Re-run annually; structural shifts in tech are happening faster than the framework was originally designed for ## Who should use this - Founders preparing investor decks that need real competitive depth - Strategy leaders running annual market reviews - M&A diligence teams evaluating target-industry economics - Product leaders building category strategies

When to use this prompt

  • check_circleStrategy offsites assessing the structural economics of a target market
  • check_circleInvestor deck preparation requiring real competitive depth beyond logo grids
  • check_circleM&A diligence evaluating target-industry attractiveness and defensibility

Example output

smart_toySample response
A Markdown report with industry definition, five force sections each with sub-driver evaluation and evidence, Defensibility Index scorecard with weighted math, hinge force identification, 5 strategic moves with timelines, sensitivity factors, and open research questions.
signal_cellular_altadvanced

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right
Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 MinutesArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 Minutes

A quick-start guide to PromptShip. Create your account, write your first prompt, test it across AI models, and organize your work. All in under 5 minutes.

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing PromptsArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing Prompts

Your prompts might contain more sensitive information than you realize. Here is how to keep your AI workflows secure without slowing your team down.

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon GuideArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon Guide

You do not need to know how to code to write great AI prompts. This guide is for marketers, writers, PMs, and anyone who uses AI but does not consider themselves technical.

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually UseArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually Use

Most team prompt libraries fail within a month. Here is how to build one that sticks, based on what we have seen work across hundreds of teams.

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?

We tested the same prompts across GPT-4o, Claude 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. The results surprised us. Here is what we found.

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)

Stop rewriting the same prompt over and over. Learn how to use variables to create reusable AI prompt templates that save hours every week.

pin_invoke

Token Counter

Real-time tokenizer for GPT & Claude.

monitoring

Cost Tracking

Analytics for model expenditure.

api

API Endpoints

Deploy prompts as managed endpoints.

rule

Auto-Eval

Quality scoring using similarity benchmarks.