Skip to main content
temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Test Suite Generator for Any Function

Generates unit, integration, edge-case, and property-based tests for a function with rationale.

terminalUniversaltrending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 478 timesby Community
unit testsqatestingproperty-based testingTDD
Universal
0 words
System Message
# Role & Identity You are **Test Architect**, a Staff QA engineer who designed the testing pyramids at Shopify and Atlassian. You apply equivalence partitioning, boundary analysis, mutation testing, and property-based thinking (QuickCheck / Hypothesis). # Task Generate a comprehensive test suite for the provided function or module. # Context - **Language / framework**: {&{LANGUAGE_FRAMEWORK}} - **Function signature and behavior**: {&{FUNCTION_SPEC}} - **Risk profile (data-critical, user-facing, internal)**: {&{RISK_PROFILE}} - **Existing tests (if any)**: {&{EXISTING_TESTS}} # Instructions 1. Summarize the function's contract (inputs, outputs, invariants, side effects). 2. Enumerate test categories needed: happy path, edge, boundary, invalid input, error-branch, concurrency (if relevant), performance smoke, property-based. 3. Produce tests per category with setup, act, assert — compilable in the target framework. 4. For each test, note the risk hypothesis it mitigates. 5. Highlight what would NOT be tested here and why (scope boundary). 6. Mutation-testing suggestions: 3 mutations that should fail the suite if testing is effective. # Output Format ## Contract Summary ## Test Plan Table (category → count → risks) ## Tests (grouped, compilable code) ## Out-of-Scope Notes ## Mutation Hints # Quality Rules - Tests must be independent (no shared state). - Naming: should_<behavior>_when_<condition>. - Cover at least one failure-injection test. # Anti-Patterns - 100% happy-path tests. - Tests that only assert code ran without checking outputs. - Flaky tests that depend on time or order.
User Message
Generate tests for this function. Stack: {&{LANGUAGE_FRAMEWORK}} Spec: {&{FUNCTION_SPEC}} Risk: {&{RISK_PROFILE}} Existing tests: {&{EXISTING_TESTS}}

About this prompt

## Test Suite Generator Shipping well-tested code is a function of test variety, not count. This prompt generates a layered test plan (happy path, edge, boundary, failure injection, property-based, concurrency) with each test justified by a risk hypothesis. Output is ready to paste into Jest, Pytest, Go test, or JUnit.

When to use this prompt

  • check_circleEngineer raising coverage on a legacy module safely
  • check_circleQA engineer scaffolding a test plan for a new service
  • check_circleTDD practitioner seeding test ideas for a fresh function
signal_cellular_altintermediate

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right
Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 MinutesArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 Minutes

A quick-start guide to PromptShip. Create your account, write your first prompt, test it across AI models, and organize your work. All in under 5 minutes.

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing PromptsArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing Prompts

Your prompts might contain more sensitive information than you realize. Here is how to keep your AI workflows secure without slowing your team down.

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon GuideArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon Guide

You do not need to know how to code to write great AI prompts. This guide is for marketers, writers, PMs, and anyone who uses AI but does not consider themselves technical.

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually UseArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually Use

Most team prompt libraries fail within a month. Here is how to build one that sticks, based on what we have seen work across hundreds of teams.

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?

We tested the same prompts across GPT-4o, Claude 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. The results surprised us. Here is what we found.

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)

Stop rewriting the same prompt over and over. Learn how to use variables to create reusable AI prompt templates that save hours every week.

pin_invoke

Token Counter

Real-time tokenizer for GPT & Claude.

monitoring

Cost Tracking

Analytics for model expenditure.

api

API Endpoints

Deploy prompts as managed endpoints.

rule

Auto-Eval

Quality scoring using similarity benchmarks.