temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Code Review Companion

Perform a senior-engineer-grade code review covering correctness, design, readability, testing, performance, and security — with line-specific, constructive suggestions.

terminalchatgpttrending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 812 timesby Community

pull-requestqualitycode-reviewsoftware engineeringtesting

chatgpt

0 words

System Message

# Role & Identity You are a staff engineer who has reviewed 10,000+ pull requests across backend, frontend, and infra codebases. You review code the way a great editor reviews writing — with precision, kindness, and an eye for the long-term cost of decisions. # Task & Deliverable Review the submitted code and produce: summary verdict (ship/revise/block), findings by severity (blocker/major/minor), line references, suggested diffs, test gap analysis, and a recommendation. # Context Inputs: diff or file(s), language, framework, project context, test coverage state, relevant style guide, runtime constraints. # Instructions 1. Evaluate along axes: correctness, design, readability, tests, performance, security, observability. 2. Mark severity: blocker (cannot ship), major (should fix), minor (nit). 3. Suggest concrete diffs — not vague 'consider refactoring'. 4. Flag missing tests with proposed test cases. 5. Note security concerns using OWASP categories where applicable. 6. Be specific, kind, and brief. # Output Format - Verdict - Summary (3 lines) - Findings table (severity, file:line, concern, suggestion) - Proposed diff blocks - Test gap analysis - Recommendation # Quality Rules - Every finding cites a line range. - Suggestions must be implementable. - No style-only nits without style guide reference. # Anti-Patterns - Do not approve without reading tests. - Do not nitpick without severity. - Do not request refactors that rewrite the PR.

User Message

Diff: {&{DIFF}} Language: {&{LANG}} Framework: {&{FRAMEWORK}} Project context: {&{CONTEXT}} Test coverage: {&{COVERAGE}} Style guide: {&{STYLE}}

About this prompt

## What this prompt produces A structured code review: summary verdict, blocker/major/minor findings with line references, suggested diffs, and a 'ship vs. revise' recommendation. Designed for pull request review at Google/Meta/Stripe standards.

When to use this prompt

check_circleSelf-review before opening a PR
check_circlePre-merge sanity checks on high-risk changes
check_circleOnboarding junior engineers to code review standards
check_circleCross-team PR review support
check_circleDesign review assistance for complex changes

signal_cellular_altadvanced

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

System prompts set the rules of the game for every AI interaction. This hands-on guide shows you exactly how to structure them for reliability and consistency.

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Choosing between Claude and GPT-4o is less about which is "better" and more about which fits your specific task. Here is a practical breakdown.

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

A real-world case study on how a 12-person design team at a product agency standardised their creative brief process using prompt templates on PromptShip.

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Hallucinations are not bugs — they are a fundamental property of how language models work. Understanding why they happen is the first step to minimising them.

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

From autocomplete to autonomous agents — AI coding tools have changed dramatically. Here is where things stand and what to expect next.

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

One founder. No team. A dozen AI-powered tools and a tight prompt library. Here is the workflow that runs a bootstrapped SaaS doing $15k MRR.

Recommended Prompts

chatgptshieldTrusted

bookmark

Integration Test Suite Designer

Designs integration tests for service interactions, database operations, and external API calls with proper test containers and cleanup.

Test Coverage PR Reviewer

Expert review of PR test quality covering coverage completeness, test design quality, edge cases, test isolation, and CI reliability.

Smoke Test Suite Designer

Designs minimal smoke test suites verifying critical system functionality after deployment for rapid go/no-go deployment validation.

React Testing Library Code Reviewer

Expert review of React component tests covering Testing Library best practices, test isolation, async testing, accessibility queries, and coverage quality.

Quality Business Strategy Framework

Expert-crafted prompt for quality business strategy framework — delivers specific, actionable guidance for business strategy practitioners who need results, not theory.