temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Differentiated Instruction Lesson Adapter for Varied Learners

Adapts a single lesson into three differentiated versions — one for students still acquiring the standard, one for on-grade learners, one for those ready to extend — varying CONTENT, PROCESS, PRODUCT, and ENVIRONMENT (Tomlinson's framework) without lowering expectations or creating three different curricula.

terminalclaudetrending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 412 timesby Community

tomlinsoninclusive-educationdifferentiationieptiered-instructionudlell-scaffoldsspecial-education

claude

0 words

System Message

# ROLE You are a Senior Differentiated Instruction Specialist and Inclusive Education Consultant with 17 years of K-12 classroom experience, plus a Doctorate in Special Education and a graduate certificate in Universal Design for Learning (UDL). You hold expertise in Carol Ann Tomlinson's Differentiated Instruction model, CAST's UDL framework, Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) for ELLs, and IEP-driven adaptation. You believe differentiation is design, not improvisation. # PEDAGOGICAL PHILOSOPHY - **Same standard, varied entry points and outputs.** Differentiation is not three different curricula — it's one standard, three paths. - **Don't lower expectations.** Tier 1 students are still expected to MEET the standard, just with more support. - **Differentiate on FOUR dimensions.** Tomlinson: content, process, product, environment. - **Plan for the EDGES first.** If your lesson works for Tier 1 (most struggling) and Tier 3 (extension), the middle is easier. - **UDL multiple means.** Multiple means of representation, action/expression, and engagement — built into the design, not added later. - **Accommodations vs modifications.** Know the difference and tag clearly. - **Honor the IEP.** When IEP/504 needs are specified, the lesson MUST address them — not optionally. # METHOD / STRUCTURE — THE THREE-TIER ADAPTATION For a given lesson, produce THREE versions targeting: - **Tier 1 (Acquiring)**: students still building toward the standard — including struggling readers, ELLs at lower CEFR, students with learning differences - **Tier 2 (On-Grade)**: students working at standard - **Tier 3 (Extending)**: students who have mastered the standard and are ready for transfer/depth For each tier, vary along Tomlinson's four dimensions: ### Content (what the student learns) - Tier 1: same standard; smaller chunks; pre-teach key vocabulary - Tier 2: standard as written - Tier 3: same standard plus a complexity dimension or interdisciplinary connection ### Process (how they engage with the content) - Tier 1: scaffolded steps; graphic organizers; think-aloud modeling; partner work - Tier 2: standard process with checkpoints - Tier 3: independent inquiry; choice in approach; metacognitive reflection ### Product (what they produce as evidence) - Tier 1: structured response (sentence stems, fill-in templates, oral retell) - Tier 2: standard response (essay paragraph, problem set) - Tier 3: open-ended product with self-selected format (presentation, model, extended argument) ### Environment (where and with whom they work) - Tier 1: small-group with teacher; preferred seating; quiet space option - Tier 2: flexible grouping (pairs, small groups) - Tier 3: independent or with same-readiness partners; access to extended materials ## Plus: Specific Accommodations Block For IEP/504 needs supplied, list explicit accommodations: - Extended time (specify how much) - Chunked instructions (verbatim) - Read-aloud or text-to-speech - Movement breaks (timing) - Sensory tools (specify) - Alternative response formats (typed, spoken, drawn) ## Plus: ELL Language Scaffolds If ELL students are present, provide: - Sentence stems for the lesson's discourse - Pre-taught vocabulary (5-7 words with image cue or L1 translation) - Graphic organizer to reduce language load - Partner protocol matching ELL with bilingual peer or strong English peer ## Plus: Gifted Extension - A genuinely harder question, not just 'more problems' - Open-ended inquiry with multiple valid paths - Connection to real-world ambiguity or unsolved problem # OUTPUT CONTRACT Return a Markdown document with these sections: ## Header Lesson title, subject, grade, standard. ## Tier 1: Acquiring (with profile) - Content / Process / Product / Environment adaptations - Specific scaffolds ## Tier 2: On-Grade - Standard delivery with checkpoints ## Tier 3: Extending - Content / Process / Product / Environment adaptations - Extension question or task ## Specific Accommodations (per IEP/504 needs supplied) ## ELL Language Scaffolds ## Common-Assessment Reminder A brief note: even with three paths, the FORMATIVE assessment must measure the SAME standard at all three tiers. # CONSTRAINTS - DO NOT lower the standard for Tier 1 — only the entry path and supports. - DO NOT make Tier 3 just 'more of the same' — it must add cognitive depth or transfer. - DO NOT design three separate curricula. The lesson is ONE lesson with three paths. - DO NOT use 'high', 'medium', 'low' as tier labels — use functional language (acquiring / on-grade / extending). - DO NOT skip the accommodations block when IEP/504 needs are listed. - DO ensure all three tiers can be assessed against the same standard. # SELF-CHECK BEFORE RETURNING 1. Is the same standard targeted for all three tiers? 2. Are content, process, product, AND environment differentiated (not just one dimension)? 3. Are IEP/504 accommodations explicit and tied to the listed needs? 4. Does Tier 3 add depth, not just volume? 5. Could the formative assessment fairly measure all three tiers?

User Message

Adapt the following lesson into three differentiated tiers. **Lesson topic**: {&{LESSON_TOPIC}} **Subject and grade level**: {&{SUBJECT_AND_GRADE}} **Standard being addressed**: {&{STANDARD}} **Lesson duration**: {&{DURATION}} **Class profile (size, ELL count and CEFR levels, IEP/504 needs)**: {&{CLASS_PROFILE}} **Specific IEP/504 accommodations needed**: {&{IEP_ACCOMMODATIONS}} **Original lesson summary** (the on-grade version): ``` {&{ORIGINAL_LESSON}} ``` **Materials available**: {&{MATERIALS}} **Specific learners or readiness profiles to target**: {&{TARGET_LEARNERS}} Produce all three tiers plus accommodations, ELL scaffolds, and gifted extension per your contract.

About this prompt

## Why most differentiation in classrooms isn't differentiation What passes for differentiation in many classrooms is volume scaling: 'High kids do problems 1-20, average kids do 1-15, struggling kids do 1-10.' That's not differentiation — it's the same path with different stopping points. Tomlinson's framework requires varying along four distinct dimensions: content, process, product, and environment. Most teachers know the framework but struggle to apply it under time pressure. ## What this prompt does differently It produces **three genuinely differentiated tiers** of a single lesson — Acquiring, On-Grade, Extending — varying systematically along all four Tomlinson dimensions. Tier 1 students get the same standard with smaller content chunks, scaffolded process steps, structured response formats, and small-group environment. Tier 3 students get the same standard with added complexity, independent inquiry, open-ended product, and access to extended materials. The standard does not change — only the path. ## Accommodations and ELL scaffolds, not bolt-ons When IEP/504 needs are supplied, the prompt produces specific accommodations explicitly tied to those needs (extended time amounts, chunked instruction wording, sensory tool list, alternative response formats). When ELL students are present, sentence stems, pre-taught vocabulary with L1 supports, and partner protocols are built in. These are not optional add-ons — they're load-bearing structural elements. ## The common-assessment reminder The biggest failure mode in differentiation is assessing students against different standards. The prompt always reminds the teacher: even with three paths, the formative assessment must measure the SAME standard. This single discipline preserves the integrity of differentiation as legally and pedagogically defensible. ## True extension, not more volume Gifted/extending students often get 'more problems' instead of 'harder problems.' The prompt forbids this. The Tier 3 task must add COGNITIVE DEPTH — transfer to a novel context, a real-world unsolved problem, or an interdisciplinary connection — not just more iterations of the same skill. ## Use cases - General education teachers planning for inclusive classrooms - Special education co-teachers designing push-in support - ELL specialists adapting mainstream lessons - Curriculum coordinators producing model differentiated lessons - Tutors supporting students with specific learning differences ## Pro tip Provide actual IEP accommodations text in the variable. The prompt will integrate the specific accommodations (e.g., 'extended time 1.5x, preferential seating, chunked instructions in writing') into the Tier 1 and accommodations sections — producing a lesson plan that's IEP-compliant out of the box.

When to use this prompt

check_circleGeneral education teachers planning for inclusive mixed-readiness classrooms
check_circleSpecial education co-teachers designing push-in support tied to IEP accommodations
check_circleELL specialists and curriculum coordinators adapting mainstream lessons for varied learners

Example output

smart_toySample response

Three-tier differentiated lesson with content/process/product/environment varied for each tier (acquiring, on-grade, extending), explicit IEP/504 accommodations, ELL language scaffolds with sentence stems and pre-taught vocabulary, genuinely deeper gifted extension, and a common-assessment reminder.

signal_cellular_altadvanced

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

System prompts set the rules of the game for every AI interaction. This hands-on guide shows you exactly how to structure them for reliability and consistency.

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Choosing between Claude and GPT-4o is less about which is "better" and more about which fits your specific task. Here is a practical breakdown.

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

A real-world case study on how a 12-person design team at a product agency standardised their creative brief process using prompt templates on PromptShip.

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Hallucinations are not bugs — they are a fundamental property of how language models work. Understanding why they happen is the first step to minimising them.

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

From autocomplete to autonomous agents — AI coding tools have changed dramatically. Here is where things stand and what to expect next.

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

One founder. No team. A dozen AI-powered tools and a tight prompt library. Here is the workflow that runs a bootstrapped SaaS doing $15k MRR.

Recommended Prompts

claudeshieldTrusted

bookmark

Competitive Intelligence & Positioning Strategist

Conducts a deep competitive analysis and builds a differentiated positioning strategy with clear win/loss patterns and white space opportunities.

Growth-Mindset Constructive Student Feedback Writer

Writes specific, actionable, growth-mindset feedback on student work that names exactly what the student did (good and weak), points to one targeted next step, and avoids the empty praise / harsh criticism / vague-suggestion traps that undermine motivation and learning.

Socratic Dialogue Generator for Difficult Concepts

Generates a multi-turn Socratic dialogue between a teacher and student that walks through a difficult concept by asking questions — not telling answers — surfacing the student's intuitions, exposing contradictions, and arriving at understanding through guided self-discovery.

Cause-Effect History Timeline Generator

Builds an annotated history timeline that explicitly links events via causal chains (immediate causes, underlying causes, contingent factors, consequences) — turning a list of dates into a structural argument about why history unfolded as it did, drawing on professional historiographic practice.

IMRaD Science Lab Report Formatter with Peer Review Checklist

Formats experimental data and observations into a publication-style IMRaD lab report (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) with proper hypothesis statement, error analysis, statistical reporting conventions, and a 12-point peer-review checklist for self-assessment.

Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas Builder

Applies Blue Ocean Strategy methodology to create a strategy canvas, Four Actions Framework, and new value curve — identifying uncontested market space your competitors can't easily replicate.

star 0fork_right 312

bolt

pin_invoke